Pre-writing.
It’s ironic, zero pre-writing actually took place in the
creation of this response to a prompt proposed by my professor yesterday, that
questioned what past teachers had taught me about my pre-writing process. Had
this been a larger assignment, I would have used different “pre-writing” techniques
to tackle it. However it is not, so this less organized approach will do.
If I remember back to my elementary school days, along with
the intense tetherball and fierce foursquare games some learning may have taken
place. I do remember a pre-writing process we learned in class during, I
believe, 5th grade. It was called the “brain storm cloud”, which now
sounds more like the state my mind is in during a tough finals week. But, if I
recall correctly, it dealt with large spheres or the “clouds”, in which you
would place your ideas and concepts. Then, you would connect the clouds with
lighting bolts and from their, you were expected to piece together a well-written
paper (of the 5th grade variety). The goal of this style, I guess,
was to layout a foundation that would support and produce a smart and
well-organized paper. It’s funny, when I think of storms the last word that
pops to mind is organized, or even smart for that matter.
Another pre-writing style I picked up was provided to me in
High School, I can’t remember the name of it, but it was and still is pretty
useful. The idea was to list out what generally you wanted to talk about, like
an outline. Then, write the paper. Once you have completed the paper, break
each paragraph down into more general concepts. After that, reverse both the
original outline and the new list and compare/contrast. The idea is to enable
the writer to be able to look at his paper on both a micro and macro level. I
fall back on this method every once and awhile, as it does give me the ability
to make sure my paper is both linear and coherent.
Question about Encomium of Helen by Gorgias:
“Speech is a powerful lord that with the smallest and most
invisible body accomplishes most godlike works.” (Aristotle on Rhetoric, 253)
I would like to learn more about Aristotle and his ideas of
speech and the larger entity of Rhetoric. Obviously, I want to become a better
writer, I need to fully wield this god/lord like ability, speech. I also wonder
to what extent Aristotle was trying to reach by making a statement such as this
one, and to whom he was trying to communicate these ideas with. I hope these
questions and many others can be answered through this English class this
semester.
I think he was advertizing the portability and potency of spoken word, bane to totalitarians everywhere.
ReplyDeleteAristotle was trying to showcase his talents as an advertisement for his services. This much Kirk told us. I think the more interesting question is why he chose to showcase his talents in *this* particular way. Also, I wonder if it worked, and how it would work today?
ReplyDeleteThat was Gorgias, not Aristotle! Just an important distinction, of course. It gets reproduced in the Aristotle book, but Aristotle wouldn't have endorsed that!
ReplyDelete